In this article the authors continue to explore the difficulties of organizing and carrying out capital repairs in medical institutions in the conditions of their functioning. The article focuses on the problem of lack of informativity of the regulatory documents about organization and realization of capital repair of medical institutions in the conditions of their functioning, which was mentioned in the authors' previous article. The authors analyze the regulatory documents, explore the experience of capital repair of existing medical and preventive institutions and highlight the main reasons, why the regulatory documents aren't so informative. The first reason - there are no recomendations about, how medical institution should keep its functioning according the time of capital repair. The second reason - there are no recommendations how renovation should be orginized out while maintaining all hygienic requirements of hospitals functioning (noise level, cleanliness, etc.). The third reason - regulatory documents contradict each other in some issues. All these reasons lead to the following consequences: delayed deadlines, lower quality of work, higher repair costs, lower working conditions for staff and lower quality of health services. The authors propose a comprehensive approach to a solution not previously reported in their research: updating the regulatory documents by adding special sections on capital repairs, creating special guidelines that will be only about capital repair of medical institutions and improving the qualifications of specialists.

Keywords: capital repair, medical and preventive institution, health care, regulatory documentation, safety, construction organization, technology of capital repair organization, normative document, informativeness, recommendations, updating